# virtualtabletop vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | virtualtabletop | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 14 in Gaming | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 320 | 877 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | monthly-2026-10 · 1 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

Zero-K scores 62/100 against 49/100 for virtualtabletop, so it is the safer default.

virtualtabletop ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; virtualtabletop needs more configuration.

Zero-K is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [virtualtabletop](https://selfhost.directory/project/virtualtabletop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/virtualtabletop.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/virtualtabletop-vs-zero-k