# Vigil365 vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted [Security projects](https://selfhost.directory/security), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Vigil365 | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #46 of 78 in Security | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 284 | 16 068 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +245 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 32 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 | w2026-10-29 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C# | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+245 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Vigil365](https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/vigil365-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap