verdacciovsYarrtube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| verdaccio | Yarrtube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Package Management | #84 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 17 956 | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 45/100 for Yarrtube, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Yarrtube.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Yarrtube needs more configuration.
verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
verdaccio details →Yarrtube details →
Swap a project
Keep verdaccio, compare it with
Keep Yarrtube, compare it with