verdacciovswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| verdaccio | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Package Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 956 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 | 3 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
verdaccio details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep verdaccio, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with