# verdaccio vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | verdaccio | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Package Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 17 954 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +157 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

verdaccio scores 75/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [verdaccio](https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/verdaccio-vs-woodpecker-ci