# Vane vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Vane | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 41 in Search Engines | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 37 826 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +919 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.12.2 · 10 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Vane scores 81/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

Vane ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Vane is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Vane is growing faster right now (+919 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Vane](https://selfhost.directory/project/vane) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vane.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/vane-vs-zammad