# Vane vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Vane | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 41 in Search Engines | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 37 826 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +919 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.12.2 · 10 Apr 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Vane scores 81/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Vane is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Vane is growing faster right now (+919 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Vane](https://selfhost.directory/project/vane) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vane.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/vane-vs-wraft