# UUSEC WAF vs Wren AI OSS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | UUSEC WAF | Wren AI OSS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #4 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 17 996 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +260 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 56 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | wren-v0.17.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Wren AI OSS scores 73/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Wren AI OSS ships more often: 56 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, Wren AI OSS is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

Wren AI OSS is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)
- [Wren AI OSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/wren-ai-oss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wren-ai-oss.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uusec-waf-vs-wren-ai-oss