# UUSEC WAF vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | UUSEC WAF | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 8 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uusec-waf-vs-workout-cool