# UUSEC WAF vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | UUSEC WAF | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 8 065 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +157 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uusec-waf-vs-woodpecker-ci