# UUSEC WAF vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | UUSEC WAF | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +17 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uusec-waf-vs-wbo