# UUSEC WAF vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | UUSEC WAF | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 8 159 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +199 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Warpgate scores 75/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

Warpgate is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uusec-waf-vs-warpgate