# UUSEC WAF vs verdaccio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | UUSEC WAF | verdaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 718 | 17 954 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +57 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 29 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

verdaccio scores 75/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)
- [verdaccio](https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uusec-waf-vs-verdaccio