# Urocissa vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urocissa | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 300 | 2 924 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +122 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Zot Registry.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+122 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urocissa-vs-zot-registry