# Urocissa vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urocissa | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 300 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urocissa-vs-windows-arm