# url-to-png vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | url-to-png | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 256 | 2 922 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +120 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Zot Registry needs more configuration.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/url-to-png-vs-zot-registry