# url-to-png vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | url-to-png | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 256 | 6 519 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +107 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

url-to-png ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

Zabbix is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/url-to-png-vs-zabbix