# url-to-png vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | url-to-png | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 256 | 8 653 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +154 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

url-to-png ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/url-to-png-vs-workout-cool