# url-to-png vs Viseron

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | url-to-png | Viseron |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping | #2 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 256 | 3 670 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +121 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 | v3.7.0 · 17 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Viseron scores 70/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

Viseron ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Viseron needs more configuration.

Viseron is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)
- [Viseron](https://selfhost.directory/project/viseron) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/viseron.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/url-to-png-vs-viseron