# Urbit vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urbit | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 16 058 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +243 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+243 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urbit-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap