# Urbit vs xBrowserSync

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urbit | xBrowserSync |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #17 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 ✓ | 855 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Urbit scores 63/100 against 54/100 for xBrowserSync, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for xBrowserSync.

If you want the quickest setup, xBrowserSync is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)
- [xBrowserSync](https://selfhost.directory/project/xbrowsersync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xbrowsersync.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urbit-vs-xbrowsersync