# Urbit vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urbit | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 8 651 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +156 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | hoon | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urbit-vs-workout-cool