# Urbit vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urbit | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 8 066 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +158 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urbit-vs-woodpecker-ci