# Urbit vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urbit | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 4 338 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +46 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | hoon | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

WhisperLive---CPU scores 64/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.

If you want the quickest setup, WhisperLive---CPU is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

WhisperLive---CPU is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urbit-vs-whisperlive-cpu