# Urbit vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urbit | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 8 159 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +199 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Warpgate scores 75/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Warpgate is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urbit-vs-warpgate