# Urbit vs wanderer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urbit | wanderer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 4 032 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +133 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

wanderer scores 64/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

wanderer ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, wanderer is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

wanderer is growing faster right now (+133 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)
- [wanderer](https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urbit-vs-wanderer