# Urbit vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urbit | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 ✓ | 948 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | hoon | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Urbit scores 63/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urbit-vs-voidaccess