# Urbit vs Urocissa

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Urbit | Urocissa |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | hoon | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Urbit scores 63/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)
- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/urbit-vs-urocissa