UrBackupvsvito
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| UrBackup | vito | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 46 in Backup | #4 of 27 in Server Management |
| GitHub stars | 943 | 3 258 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 9 |
| Latest release | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 | 4.2.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
vito scores 64/100 against 60/100 for UrBackup, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, vito is easier to run; UrBackup needs more configuration.
UrBackup details →vito details →