# Uptime-Kuma-Web-API vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 6 521 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +109 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

Zabbix is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-web-api-vs-zabbix