# Uptime-Kuma-Web-API vs Wren AI OSS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | Wren AI OSS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #4 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 17 999 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +254 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 56 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | wren-v0.17.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | — | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Wren AI OSS scores 73/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

Wren AI OSS ships more often: 56 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, Wren AI OSS is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.

Wren AI OSS is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)
- [Wren AI OSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/wren-ai-oss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wren-ai-oss.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-web-api-vs-wren-ai-oss