# Uptime-Kuma-Web-API vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 89 727 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 388 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 388 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-web-api-vs-world-monitor