# Uptime-Kuma-Web-API vs verdaccio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | verdaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 17 956 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +57 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 29 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

verdaccio scores 76/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.

verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)
- [verdaccio](https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-web-api-vs-verdaccio