# Uptime-Kuma-Web-API vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 13 in API | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 3 622 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

Urbit scores 63/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-web-api-vs-urbit