# uptime-kuma vs ZPan

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | ZPan |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #8 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 93 050 ✓ | 2 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 256 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.9.0 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 56/100 for ZPan, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ZPan.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; ZPan needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [ZPan](https://selfhost.directory/project/zpan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zpan.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-zpan