# uptime-kuma vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 93 048 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 254 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-zero-k