# uptime-kuma vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 93 034 ✓ | 16 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 287 ✓ | +244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap