# uptime-kuma vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 93 050 ✓ | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 256 ✓ | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-zammad