# uptime-kuma vs ytdlp_web_player

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | ytdlp_web_player |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 93 050 ✓ | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 256 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [ytdlp_web_player](https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-ytdlpwebplayer