# uptime-kuma vs Yarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | Yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 93 058 ✓ | 4 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 264 ✓ | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 61/100 for Yarr, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Yarr.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [Yarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-yarr