# uptime-kuma vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 93 040 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 293 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.

WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; WPS Office needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 293 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-wps-office