# uptime-kuma vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 93 035 ✓ | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 288 ✓ | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-workout-cool