# uptime-kuma vs Whiteboard

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | Whiteboard |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #5 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 93 050 ✓ | 3 379 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 256 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | diffr/0.1.22 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 56/100 for Whiteboard, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Whiteboard.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [Whiteboard](https://selfhost.directory/project/whiteboard-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whiteboard-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-whiteboard-2