# uptime-kuma vs WeTTY

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | WeTTY |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 93 040 ✓ | 5 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 246 ✓ | +29 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 68/100 for WeTTY, so it is the safer default.

WeTTY ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 246 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [WeTTY](https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-wetty