# uptime-kuma vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 93 036 ✓ | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 289 ✓ | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-warpgate