# uptime-kuma vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 93 036 ✓ | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 18 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for voidaccess.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-voidaccess