# uptime-kuma vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | uptime-kuma | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 93 035 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 288 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/uptime-kuma-vs-uusec-waf