UpptimevsZPan
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | ZPan | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #8 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 17 185 | 2 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v2.9.0 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 56/100 for ZPan, so it is the safer default.
ZPan ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; ZPan needs more configuration.
Upptime details →ZPan details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep ZPan, compare it with