Upptimevszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
zookeeper is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
Upptime details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with