# Upptime vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Upptime | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 17 184 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +26 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

Zero-K is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/upptime-vs-zero-k